Nobody suffers punishment for mere intent

Thursday, August 26, 2021

MAREVA COMPANIA NAVIERA SA vs. INTERNATIONAL BULKCARRIERS LTD CASE BRIEF

MAREVA COMPANIA NAVIERA SA vs. INTERNATIONAL BULKCARRIERS LTD (The Mareva case)

Facts

Case on Mareva injunction
The applicant, Mareva Compania Naviera S.A. vide a writ on 25th June 1975 claimed against the respondent, International Bulkcarriers S.A., for unpaid hire and damages for repudiation of a charter party. Through an ex-parte application, Donaldson J granted an injunction in favour of the applicants until 17.00 hours on 23rd June restraining International Bulkcarriers (the charterers) from removing or disposing out of the jurisdiction moneys standing to the credit of the charterers, account at a London bank. Mareva Compania Naviera (the ship-owners) appealed against Donaldson J’s refusal to extend the injunction beyond 17.00 Hrs. on 23rd June 1975.

Issues for determination

Issue: Whether the court should grant an ex-parte order sought by the plaintiff to restrain the defendant dispersing/ disposing his assets.

Holding: The court granted the ad personam order/ injunction pursuant to the 1925 Act which stated: ‘A mandamus or an injunction may be granted or a receiver appointed by an interlocutory order of the court in all cases in which it shall appear to the court to be just or convenient.’
Determination

Rationale: The order could be made even though it dealt with assets in which the plaintiff claimed no direct right.

Judgment: Appeal allowed. Injunction continued.

Share:

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Powered by Blogger.

AN APPRAISAL OF THE SALIENT FEATURES OF THE SEXUAL OFFENCES ACT AND THE NEED FOR REFORMS

  This was a key part of my research during my final year in campus. There having been no amendments in the Sexual Offenses Act, this articl...

Search This Blog

Blog Archive